Favorites » His Blog
-
Top Ten Photos 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts Hate | The Lay Scientist
-
May 12, 3:03pm
66 reviews
•http://layscience.net/?q=node/124
-
Note how the blog uses loaded language such as 'conspiracy theorists' all over the article whilst crying 'junk science'.
Also, those photos are used completely out of context:
1. As they point out themselves, the no-plane theories were discredited long ago. What they don't say is that most of the debunking came from within the 9/11 Truth Movement itself.
2. Note that the debris only fell on the side of the tower, not on top of it. Photos taken after the fall of the debris do not show damage significant enough to warrant a collapse. Also WTC7 collapsed straight down and 7 hours later. If it had collapsed as a result of the debris it would have tipped over on the side of the damage.
3. Note how only the centre of WTC6 collapsed, whilst the exterior was still standing up. This would be expected if the debris poured on top of the tower. But WTC7 collapsed straight down with nothing left standing despite being further away and only getting debris on one side of the tower.
4. That there were fires in WTC7 is not disputed, but photos only showed minor fires in WTC7. Big enough, according to Jowenko, to hinder a CD team from 'pulling' the building, but not strong enough to cause the building to collapse.
6. Fragments of the plane were in fact found over a large area, as far as eight miles away. In addition, the article linked in the Post Gazette mentioned totally discredited frauds like WingTV, known for attacking members of their own movement like Alex Jones.
7. That only proves that a Flight 97 did fall down. Whether it was by missile or a real crash is irrelevant to whether 9/11 was an inside job or not.
8. Supposing that this floor bucking was actually caused by the fires or the plane crash rather than the demolition itself, this would not have been sufficient to bring down all the other floors underneath. The pancake theory was dismissed by NIST itself.
9. That photo is too vague to conclude that the workman was cutting steel beams. The workman appears to be far away from the standing beams. Also, the thermate (not thermite) was found in the dust, not on the actual beams, most of which were shipped to China to be recycled, in violation of the law and investigation procedures. Mandatory testing for thermite is also an investigation procedure that was ignored by NIST.
10. The collapse of the actual building was timed and calculations clearly showed near-free fall speeds. The falling speeds for a pancake collapse would have taken far longer.
|
Online now
Add him as a friend >
Laukev7's blog